5(a) The extract strongly engages with Van Zoonen's theory about "the male gaze" because at 2:54 the camera focuses on the man as he seems to be staring at the young lady run off. The scene complicates Van Zoonen's theory because although the lady is faced with subjectivity, it can be mixed up with her standpoint.
(b) The extract both reinforces spectacle and allows some spectatorship. This is because the camera objectifies the young lady while also showing viewers her point of view on the world around her, allowing them to have an active viewing position.
(c) Masculinity in this extract is expressed as dominant, yet weak. This is shown by the professional setting their in, as well as the formal clothing their wearing. But as she walks in and speaks with confidence, they aren't as dominant as they appear.
(d) The main lady in this extract is expressed actively as she is walking around with purpose and asking questions while the other people aren't the main focus and are objectified by the male camera perspectives.
(e) Rather then supporting Van Zoonen's theory it supports subversive female representation as it contrast to Liesbet van Zoonen theories. The use of mise-en-scene was also very impactful because her messy hair and sweat stains helped show the protagonist, as her appearance is less valuable as her personality.
No comments:
Post a Comment